SPECIAL ISSUE 2 July 2026
DOI DOI: 10.66434/ijspsy.v1i2si.470

Teacher-mediated digital pedagogies for learning and mental health in low-resource schools: A systematic review

Ntombikayise Nkosi1
  1. 1 University of South Africa, South Africa

Abstract

This systematic integrative review synthesises empirical evidence on teacher-mediated digital pedagogies and their influence on learning and mental health in low-resource schools. Digital technologies are widely promoted as solutions to educational inequality. However, reform initiatives continue to prioritise access to devices and connectivity. Less attention is given to how teachers shape digital learning environments and to the psychological impact of these environments. Mental health challenges, including stress, disengagement, and technostress, remain prevalent in under-resourced contexts. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Structured searches were conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar. The search included peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2015 and 2025. Studies examined digital pedagogy, teacher practice, low-resource schooling, and mental health outcomes. After screening and eligibility assessment, 27 studies were included in the final synthesis. Data were analysed using inductive thematic synthesis. Sociocultural theory and self-determination theory guided the interpretation. Three interrelated dimensions emerged. The first is pedagogical mediation, which includes scaffolding and instructional structure. The second is social-emotional mediation, which includes belonging, autonomy support, and psychological safety. The third is contextual mediation, which reflects infrastructural and socio-economic constraints. The findings show that digital tools support learning and mental health when used with intentional teacher mediation. Technology alone does not produce equitable or psychologically supportive outcomes. Bridging educational and mental health gaps requires sustained investment in teacher capacity and relational digital pedagogy in low-resource settings.

How to Cite

Nkosi, N. (2026). Teacher-mediated digital pedagogies for learning and mental health in low-resource schools: A systematic review. International Journal of Studies in Psychology, 1(2si), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.66434/ijspsy.v1i2si.470
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Afonyaa-Harry, J. A., & Akpan, A. J. (2025). Overcoming barriers to educational policy implementation in rural schools. International Journal of Strategic Leadership, Education and Social Sciences, 1(1), 32-52.
  2. Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2023). How to empower educators through digital pedagogies and faculty development strategies. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 7(4), 139-183.
  3. Babakhova, L. G., Khachaturyan, N. N., & Lomova, N. V. (2023). Psychological well-being of students in digital educational environment. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 389, p. 08014). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338908014
  4. Begum, N., & Gul, N. (2025). Bridging the Gap: The Role of Technology in Reducing Educational Inequality in Developing Countries. ASSAJ, 3(02), 2409-2421.
  5. Bhowmik, T., Majumdar, S., Choudhury, A., Banerjee, A., & Roy, B. (2023). Importance of internal and external psychological factors in digital learning. In Digital Learning based Education: Transcending Physical Barriers (pp. 119-132). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8967-4_8
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  7. Gabriel, F., Marrone, R., Van Sebille, Y., Kovanovic, V., & de Laat, M. (2022). Digital education strategies around the world: practices and policies. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2022513
  8. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE Publications.
  9. Han, Y., Luan, N. L., & Zhao, S. (2022). Influence of technology-mediated learning models on student satisfaction based on self-determination theory. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 23(2), 131-151.
  10. Hu, D., Yuan, B., Luo, J., & Wang, M. (2021). A Review of Empirical Research on ICT Applications in Teacher Professional Development and Teaching Practice. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 13(1), 1-20.
  11. Kalyani, L. K. (2024). The role of technology in education: Enhancing learning outcomes and 21st century skills. International journal of scientific research in modern science and technology, 3(4), 05-10. https://doi.org/10.59828/ijsrmst.v3i4.199
  12. Imran, A. (2023). Why addressing digital inequality should be a priority. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 89(3), e12255. DOI: 10.1002/isd2.12255
  13. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  14. Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  15. Mpofu, P. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: Exploring technology adoption and equity in secondary education in Eswatini. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 6(3), 348-372. https://doi.org/10.53378/ijemds.353267
  16. Nguyen, L. T., Kanjug, I., Lowatcharin, G., Manakul, T., Poonpon, K., Sarakorn, W., ... & Tuamsuk, K. (2022). How teachers manage their classroom in the digital learning environment–experiences from the University Smart Learning Project. Heliyon, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10817
  17. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.
  18. Ovcharuk, O., Ivaniuk, I., Soroko, N., Gritsenchuk, O., & Kravchyna, O. (2020). The use of digital learning tools in teachers’ professional activities to ensure sustainable development and democratization of education in European countries. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016610019
  19. Olofsson, A. D., Fransson, G., & Lindberg, J. O. (2020). A study of the use of digital technology and its conditions with a view to understanding what ‘adequate digital competence ' may mean in a national policy initiative. Educational studies, 46(6), 727-743. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1651694
  20. Reich, J. (2020). Failure to disrupt: Why technology alone can’t transform education. Harvard University Press.
  21. Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, A. B. (2020). Psychological Aspects of Digital Learning: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584
  22. Saravanakumar, A., Raja, G., & Sivakumar, P. (2023). Transforming education: Perceptions and challenges of technology-enabled teacher education programmes. Open Access Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(2), 001-007. https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjet.2023.5.2.0077
  23. Selwyn, N. (2020). Telling tales on technology: Qualitative studies of technology and education. Routledge.
  24. Tight, M. (2020). Higher education research: The developing field (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
  25. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 134, 103-112.
  26. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
  27. Pramesworo, I. S., Fathurrochman, I., Sembing, D., Bangkara, B. A., & Sudrajat, D. (2023). Relevance between Blended Learning and Students' Independent Learning Curriculum: An Overview of Digital Age Education, Student and Teacher Engagement, Technological Resources. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran, 9(3), 858-869. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i3.8320
  28. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2024). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6229-6235). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_263
  29. Väätäjä, J. O., & Ruokamo, H. (2021). Conceptualizing dimensions and a model for digital pedagogy. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15, 1834490921995395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1834490921995395
  30. Van De Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and education open, 3, 100100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100100
  31. van der Vlies, R. (2020). Digital strategies in education across OECD countries: Exploring education policies on digital technologies. OECD Education Working Papers, (226), 0_1-45. DOI:10.1787/33dd4c26-e.
  32. Wargo, E. S., & Simmons, J. (2021). Technology Storylines: A Narrative Analysis of the Rural Education Research. Rural Educator, 42(2), 35-50.
  33. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher logical processes. Harvard University Press.
  34. Zengilowski, A., Lee, J., Gaines, R. E., Park, H., Choi, E., & Schallert, D. L. (2023). The collective classroom “we”: The role of students’ sense of belonging on their affective, cognitive, and discourse experiences of online and face-to-face discussions. Linguistics and Education, 73, 101142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101142