ARTICLES
DOI DOI: 10.38140/ijspsy.v5i3.1159

Trauma, reflexivity, and the social unconscious: Decolonising psychology education in South Africa

Abstract

Psychology in South Africa continues to grapple with its colonial inheritance and its ongoing struggle for disciplinary legitimacy. This study investigates how experiential learning can advance decolonial transformation and reposition psychology as a discipline of public value. Centred on an educational tour of a site marked by both historical trauma and dialogical possibility in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, the research draws on cultural-historical activity theory and the concept of the third space to conceptualise learning as a socially mediated and hybrid process. Over a two-year period, twenty-nine postgraduate psychology students participated in the initiative, engaging in reflective surveys, photovoice activities, and facilitated discussions. These methods created opportunities to interrogate how chosen traumas, chosen glories, and processes of othering are embedded in collective memory, shaping subjectivity and social identity. The findings demonstrate that the Durban Holocaust and Genocide Centre functioned as a generative third space in which students confronted intergenerational trauma, cultivated reflexivity, and engaged with the social unconscious as a force shaping both exclusion and belonging. While moments of resistance underscored the difficulties of working with experiential pedagogy, they also revealed its potential to generate productive tensions that deepen critical thought. The study concludes that experiential learning, situated within a decolonial framework, can destabilise inherited epistemologies while fostering dialogue, empathy, and ethical awareness. In doing so, it demonstrates how psychology can expand its intellectual and social relevance, strengthen its disciplinary legitimacy, and contribute to broader imperatives of social justice, epistemic freedom, and curricular transformation in South African higher education.

How to Cite

Auld, S. M. (2025). Trauma, reflexivity, and the social unconscious: Decolonising psychology education in South Africa. International Journal of Studies in Psychology, 5(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijspsy.v5i3.1159

References

  1. Auld, S. M. (2024). Reconceptualising Academic Citizenship in the Global South via an Interdisciplinary Debate Club. In C. G. Iwu (ed.), Academic Citizenship in African Higher Education: Towards a Socio-economic Development Agenda (pp. 87-108). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  2. Auld, S. M. (2025). Student Photovoice: Durban Holocaust and Genocide Centre Image. Durban Holocaust and Genocide Centre, Durban, South Africa.
  3. Bar-Tal, D. (2003). Collective memory of physical violence: Its contribution to the culture of violence. In E. Cairns & M. D. Roe (eds.), The role of memory in ethnic conflict. Ethnic and Intercommunity Conflict Series (pp. 77-93). London: Palgrave Macmillan Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919823_5
  4. Barthes, R. (1985). Rhetoric of the Image. Semiotics: An introductory anthology, (192-205). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  5. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative research, 15(2), 219-234.
  6. Bhabha, H. K., & Rutherford, J. (2006). Third space. Multitudes, 26(3), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.026.0095
  7. Biesta, G. (2012). Philosophy of education for the public good: Five challenges and an agenda. Educational philosophy and theory, 44(6), 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00783.x
  8. Bion, W. (1962). Learning from Experience. New York: Basic Books.
  9. Blanche, M. T., Blanche, M. J. T., Durrheim, K., & Painter, D. (2006). Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences. Cape Town: Juta and Company Ltd.
  10. Boler, M., & Zembylas, M. (2003). Discomforting truths: The emotional terrain of understanding difference. In Pedagogies of difference (pp. 107-130). London: Routledge.
  11. Booysen, S. (2016). Fees Must Fall. Student revolt, decolonisation and governance in South Africa: Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
  12. Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2017). Towards a response-able pedagogy across higher education institutions in post-apartheid South Africa: An ethico-political analysis. Education as change, 21(2), 62-85. https://doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2017/2017
  13. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  14. Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher: New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism. London: Routledge.
  16. Chilisa, B. (2019). Indigenous research methodologies: Lonon: Sage publications.
  17. Cloete, N. (2014). The South African higher education system: performance and policy. Studies in Higher Education, 39(8), 1355-1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.949533
  18. Costandius, E., Nell, I., Alexander, N., McKay, M., Blackie, M., Malgas, R., & Setati, E. (2018). #FeesMustFall and decolonising the curriculum: Stellenbosch University students’ and lecturers’ reactions. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(2), 65-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.20853/32-2-2435
  19. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: Sage publications.
  20. Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. London: Routledge.
  21. Davydov, V. V. (1988). Problems of developmental teaching: the experience of theoretical and experimental psychological research: excerpts. Armonk, North Castle, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  22. Denzin, N. K. (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry (Vol. 2): London: Sage publications.
  23. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research: London: Sage publications.
  24. Engeström, Y. (2001). Making expansive decisions: An activity-theoretical study of practitioners building collaborative medical care for children. In C. M. Allwood & M. Selart (eds.). Decision making: Social and creative dimensions (pp. 281-301). Dordrecht: Springer.
  25. Fataar, A. (2018). Decolonising education in South Africa: Perspectives and debates. Educational Research for Social Change, 7(SPE), vi-ix.
  26. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., & Jurist, E. L. (2018). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. London: Routledge.
  27. Foulkes, S. H. (1964). Therapeutic group analysis. In S. H. Foulkes (ed.). London: Allen & Unwin.
  28. Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
  29. Fromm, E. (2001). Beyond the chains of illusion: My encounter with Marx and Freud (Vol. 780). New York: A & C Black.
  30. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.
  31. Gutiérrez, K. D. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading research quarterly, 43(2), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.2.3