ARTICLES
DOI DOI: 10.38140/ijspsy.v6i1.2221

Exploring doctoral students’ perceptions of supervisory attributes shaping their intellectual growth, motivation, and scholarly development.

Hansen Akoto-Baako1, Jotham Prem Heeralal 1, Ndwandwe Dennis Ntokozo 2
  1. 1 Department of Psychology of Education, University of South Africa, South Africa
  2. 2 Department of Educational Foundations, University of South Africa, Pretoria South African

Abstract

The attributes of supervisors within educational contexts play a critical role in shaping students’ cognitive development towards lifelong learning. Thus, the specific supervisory attributes that enable this process to remain under-explored. This study examines how postgraduate students perceive that their supervisors' attributes influence their intellectual growth, motivation, and scholarly development. It employs a qualitative approach, utilising a thematic research design. Nine Ghanaian doctoral students were selected from a public University in Ghana. It used semi-structured interviews to collect data. They were analysed through thematic analysis. This study revealed various supervisory attributes, including intellectual stimulation, emotional/motivational support, autonomy versus directive supervision, availability/responsiveness, modelling scholarly rigour, feedback quality, and interpersonal dynamics. The findings revealed that supervisory attributes form an invisible scaffold that critically shapes cognitive engagement and intellectual growth. The key catalysts include intellectual stimulation, emotional support, and a balance between autonomy and guidance. Overall, prescriptive supervision stifles students' curiosity. These novel findings underscore the importance of intellectual humility and collaborative, dynamic supervision in fostering deep engagement. This study offers actionable insights for developing adaptive mentoring practices that align with students' evolving needs, thereby contributing to effective supervisory training within global higher education.

How to Cite

Akoto-Baako, H., Prem Heeralal , J., & Dennis Ntokozo , N. (2026). Exploring doctoral students’ perceptions of supervisory attributes shaping their intellectual growth, motivation, and scholarly development. International Journal of Studies in Psychology, 6(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijspsy.v6i1.2221
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Acosta-Gonzaga, E., & Ramirez-Arellano, A. (2022). Scaffolding matters? Investigating its role in motivation, engagement, and learning achievements in higher education. Sustainability, 14(20), 13419. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013419
  2. Adedokun, T., & Oyetunde-Joshua, F. (2024). Navigating the academic odyssey: Exploring the role of supervisors in supporting postgraduate students. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2024.1
  3. Adedokun, T., & Oyetunde-Joshua, F. (2024). Strengthening student-supervisor relationships: An examination of postgraduate students' perspectives on supervisory supports. Jurnal Manajemen dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 8(2), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.17977/um025v8i22024p95
  4. AlQhtani, F. M. (2025). Knowledge management for research innovation in universities for sustainable development: A qualitative approach. Sustainability, 17(6), 2481. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062481
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  6. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  9. Burr, V., King, N., & Butt, T. (2014). Personal Construct Psychology Methods for Qualitative Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(4), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2012.730702
  10. Calor, S. M., Dekker, R., van Drie, J. P., & Volman, M. L. (2022). Scaffolding small groups at the group level: Improving the scaffolding behavior of mathematics teachers during mathematical discussions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(3), 369–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.2024834
  11. Chugh, R., Macht, S., & Harreveld, B. (2022). Supervisory feedback to postgraduate research students: A literature review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1955241
  12. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Commentary: Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613