ARTICLES
DOI DOI: 10.38140/ijspsy.v6i1.2446

Exploring the influence of compulsory adoption of a learning management system on the students’ mental well-being at a rural university in South Africa

Oluwatoyin Ajani 1, Samantha Govender2, Bongani Thulani Gamede2
  1. 1 University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Education, South Africa
  2. 2 Educational Foundations and management, University of Zululand, South Africa

Abstract

The global adoption of technology in teaching and learning has significantly transformed higher education, with the use of various platforms for curriculum delivery influencing students’ mental well-being in their learning experiences. This study explores how the mandatory adoption of a learning management system can influence the students' mental well-being at a rural university in South Africa. It adopts a qualitative, phenomenological design. Data were collected through extensive semi-structured interviews. Forty students were purposively selected from a rural university in South Africa. Data were analysed through thematic analysis. The results revealed that technostress, digital fatigue, and resilience could affect the students’ mental well-being. The study further acknowledged perceived support sources and their absence within the online learning environment. The findings implied that technology implementation in educational institutions should be more empathetic, culturally responsive, and mindful. This study contributes to the creation of digitally equitable and psychologically supportive learning environments in the Global South.

How to Cite

Ajani , O., Govender, S., & Gamede, B. T. (2026). Exploring the influence of compulsory adoption of a learning management system on the students’ mental well-being at a rural university in South Africa. International Journal of Studies in Psychology, 6(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijspsy.v6i1.2446
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Abbad, M. M. M. (2021). Using the UTAUT model to understand students’ usage of e learning systems in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7205–7224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10573-5
  2. Adigun, O. T., Mpofu, N., & Maphalala, M. C. (2024). Fostering self-directed learning in blended learning environments: A constructivist perspective in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(1), e12572. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12572
  3. Adigun, O. T., Nzima, D. R., Maphalala, M. C., & Ndwandwe, N. D. (2022). COVID-19 and learners with disabilities: Towards divergent praxis in teacher preparation for equity and epistemic justice. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(4), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-4-5178
  4. Ajani, O. A. (2025). Enhancing knowledge production through the management of technology and innovation in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences, 5(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijias.v5i2.1644
  5. Ajani, O. A., & Matiyenga, T. C. (2025). Enhancing critical analysis and argumentation skills in university students through multimodal approaches: A comprehensive study. International Journal of Educational Reform. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879251326556
  6. Ajani, O. A., & Rathilal, S. (2025). Exploring design thinking for innovation in higher education: A comprehensive review of varied influential factors. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 12(1), 21–32. https://zenodo.org/records/15804504
  7. Ajani, O. A., Gamede, B. T., & Govender, S. (2025). Cultural and ethical dimensions of learning management system adoption in rural universities: Exploring data privacy, algorithmic bias, and contextual realities. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8, 2026142. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026142
  8. Alghamdi, A. A. (2022). Digital transformation within Saudi education system: 2020 and beyond. Education Review, 6(4), 419–425.
  9. Almaiah, M. A., Al Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020b). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing e learning system usage during the COVID 19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
  10. Almaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al Rahmi, W. M. (2020a). Applying the DeLone and McLean information system success model to understand the factors affecting students’ satisfaction with a learning management system in Saudi Arabia. IEEE Access, 8, 122295–122307. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000000
  11. Alotumi, M. (2022). Factors influencing graduate students’ behavioural intention to use Google Classroom: A case study mixed methods research. Education and Information Technologies, 27(12), 10035–10063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11051-2
  12. Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
  13. Bayaga, A., & du Plessis, A. (2024). Ramifications of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology among developing countries’ higher education staff. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 9689–9714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12194-6
  14. Bervell, B., & Umar, I. N. (2019). A decade of learning management system acceptance and adoption research in Sub-Saharan African higher education: A systematic review from 2004 to 2018. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3593–3627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09945-z
  15. Blignaut, S., Blignaut, R. J., Chivhanga, S., Leendertz, V., Venter, I. M., & Renaud, K. (2022). Belonging, well-being, and stress with online learning during COVID-19. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(6), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.20853/36-6-5525
  16. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching during the coronavirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi.
  17. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  18. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  19. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
  20. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  21. Faloye, S. T., & Ajayi, N. (2022). Understanding the impact of the digital divide on South African students in higher educational institutions. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 14(7), 1734–1744. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2021.1983118
  22. Ficapal Cusí, P., Torrent Sellens, J., Folgado Fernández, J. A., & Palos Sánchez, P. R. (2024). Sudden e learning: Exploring the role of user intention, enjoyment, and habit on university students’ well-being. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(3), 1138–1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12519
  23. Folabit, N. L., Jita, L. C., & Jita, T. (2025). Impact of technology integration on students’ sense of belonging and well-being: A systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 14(2), 1075–1084.
  24. James, T. L., Zhang, J., Li, H., Ziegelmayer, J. L., & Villacis Calderon, E. D. (2022). The moderating effect of technology overload on the ability of online learning to meet students’ basic psychological needs. Information Technology and People, 35(4), 1364–1382. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2021-0225
  25. Jones, C., & Pimdee, P. (2017). Innovative ideas: Thailand 4.0 and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Asian International Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 4–35.
  26. Khoza, S. (2024). Navigating the dark: Understanding the impact of load shedding on learning management systems in South African universities. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 13(2), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3134
  27. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. Review of Higher Education, 12(3), 221–240.
  28. Maphalala, M. C., & Adigun, O. T. (2020). Academics’ experience of implementing e learning in a South African higher education institution. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n1p1
  29. Mendoza, A., & Venables, A. (2023). Attributes of blended learning environments designed to foster a sense of belonging for higher education students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 22, 129–156. https://doi.org/10.28945/5082
  30. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  31. Mooney, C., & Becker, B. A. (2021). Investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on computing students’ sense of belonging. ACM Inroads, 12(2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463408
  32. Mpungose, C. B. (2020). Emergent transition from face-to-face to online learning in a South African university in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), Article 113. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00603-x
  33. Naidoo, P., & Cartwright, D. (2022). Where to from here? Contemplating the impact of COVID-19 on South African students and student counselling services in higher education. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 36(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2020.1842279
  34. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  35. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed-method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  36. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  37. Pedler, M. L., Willis, R., & Nieuwoudt, J. E. (2022). A sense of belonging at university: Student retention, motivation and enjoyment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1955844
  38. Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.
  39. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
  40. Smith, J., & Rahman, A. (2021). Implementation of cloud-based learning management systems in developing countries: Challenges and prospects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09885-x
  41. Tang, C., Tsui, M. S. H., Chan, F. H. W., Wong, S. Y. S., & Wong, J. Y. H. (2023). Impact of online learning on sense of belonging among first-year clinical health students during COVID-19: Student and academic perspectives. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), Article 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04061-2
  42. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  43. Xue, L., Rashid, A. M., & Ouyang, S. (2024). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology in higher education: A systematic review. SAGE Open, 14(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241229570
  44. Xue, L., Rashid, A. M., & Ouyang, S. (2024). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in higher education: A systematic review. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241229570
  45. Zheng, L., Zhao, Z., & McMahon, G. (2020). Technology facilitated learning in higher education: Dimensions of student staff engagement. Computers and Education, 144, 103714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103714