SPECIAL ISSUE 1 July 2026
DOI DOI: 10.66434/ijsie.v1i1si.544

Exploring how school management teams interpret and implement inclusive education frameworks in resource-constrained settings

Abstract

South Africa’s inclusive education reforms, articulated through Education White Paper 6 and the SIAS Policy, aim to transform special schools into equitable learning environments. However, persistent gaps between policy ideals and school-level realities raise critical questions about implementation. This study explores how School Management Teams (SMTs) interpret and implement inclusive education frameworks in resource-constrained settings. A qualitative case study design within an interpretivist paradigm was adopted. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. These were conducted with SMT members, an occupational therapist, and a district official in KwaZulu-Natal. Data analysis employed a thematic approach, guided by adaptive and distributed leadership theories. The findings revealed five key themes: limited knowledge of policy mandates, entrenched systemic barriers, adaptive leadership practices, insufficient professional development, and weak accountability mechanisms. Findings highlight the disjuncture between policy rhetoric and school realities, while also demonstrating SMTs’ resilience through collaborative problem-solving, resource reallocation, and context-specific innovations. This study contributes original insights by situating policy analysis within the contours of the lived experiences of SMTs, therapists, and district officials. It underscores the urgent need for systemic investment, differentiated funding, integrated professional development, and stronger accountability structures. By bridging global discourses and local realities, the study advances a context-sensitive understanding of inclusive education leadership in South African special schools, offering actionable implications for policy-makers, district officials, and school leaders.

How to Cite

Dlamini, Q. P., & Cele , S. M. K. (2026). Exploring how school management teams interpret and implement inclusive education frameworks in resource-constrained settings. International Journal of Studies in Inclusive Education, 1(1si), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.66434/ijsie.v1i1si.544

References

  1. Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: the role of organisational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802504903
  2. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203967157
  3. Cobb, G. (2015). Mere Renovation is Too Little Too Late: We Need to Rethink our Undergraduate Curriculum from the Ground Up. The American Statistician, 69(4), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2015.1093029
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  5. D’Alessio, S. (2012). Inclusive education in Italy (Vol. 10). Springer Science & Business Media.
  6. Dahal, N., Neupane, B. P., Pant, B. P., Dhakal, R. K., Giri, D. R., Ghimire, P. R., & Bhandari, L. P. (2024). Participant selection procedures in qualitative research: experiences and some points for consideration. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 9, 1512747. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1512747
  7. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
  8. DeMatthews, D. E., Serafini, A., & Watson, T. N. (2021). Leading Inclusive Schools: Principal Perceptions, Practices, and Challenges to Meaningful Change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20913897
  9. Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2014). Policy on screening, identification, assessment and support. Republic of South Africa.
  10. Department of Basic Education (DBE). (2025). Strategic Plan 2025–2030 and Annual Performance Plan 2025/26. Republic of South Africa.
  11. Department of Education (DoE). (2001). The Education White Paper 6 on Inclusive Education. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Printers.
  12. Engelbrecht, P. (2006). The implementation of inclusive education in South Africa after ten years of democracy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2(3), 253. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173414
  13. Florian, L. (2007). Reimagining special education. In L. Florian (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education (pp. 7–20). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607989
  14. Florian, L. (2022). Preparing Teachers for Inclusive Education. In Peters, M. A. (eds), Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8679-5_39
  15. Fox, M. (2015). Developing as a trainee educational psychologist: Establishing the psychological contract. Educational Psychology Research and Practice, 1(1), 17–22.
  16. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  17. Fullan, M. (2011). Change leader: Learning to do what matters most. Jossey-Bass.
  18. Göransson, K., & Nilholm, C. (2014). Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings – a critical analysis of research on inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933545
  19. Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
  20. Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674038479
  21. Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.
  22. Héroux, S., & Roussy, M. (2020). Three cases of compliance with governance regulation: an organizational learning perspective. Journal of Management & Governance, 24(2), 449–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09468-y
  23. Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). (2025). Inclusive Education Monitoring Report. Pretoria: HSRC.
  24. Isaacs, S. (2020). South Africa’s (unequal) digital learning journey: A critical review. In C. K. Looi, H. Zhang, Y. Gao, & L. Wu (Eds.), ICT in education and implications for the Belt and Road Initiative (Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, pp. 45–60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_4
  25. Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124.
  26. Lawson, A., & Beckett, A. (2020). The social and human rights models of disability: towards a complementarity thesis. The International Journal of Human Rights. 25, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2020.1783533
  27. Lee, B., Collier, P.M., Cullen, J., Llewellyn, S., & Northcott, D. (2007). "The “singular view” in management case studies". Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 2 (3), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640710835355
  28. Manyaka, M., & Simui, F. (2026). Exploring hybrid leadership's influence on school-based support teams in no-fee primary schools. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 16(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v16i1.1807
  29. Mashamba, S., Mahomed, S., & van Wyk, J. (2025). Challenges faced by staff managing learners with Spina Bifida in South African special schools. Health SA Gesondheid, 30, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2993
  30. Mokhampanyane, M. (2024). Teachers’ capabilities in implementing inclusive education: A South African perspective. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 9(3), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2024.44
  31. Mpu, Y., & Adu, E. O. (2021). The challenges of inclusive education and its implementation in schools: The South African perspective. Perspectives in Education. 39. 225–238. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i2.16
  32. Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
  33. National Council for Persons with Disabilities (NCPD). (2025). Disability-20 inclusive education engagements: Policy-practice synthesis. NCPD. Retrieved from https://ncpd.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Disability-20-Inclusive-Education.pdf
  34. Ngobeni, N. R., Chibambo, M. I., & Divala, J. J. (2023). Curriculum transformations in South Africa: Some discomforting truths on interminable poverty and inequalities in schools and society. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1132167. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1132167
  35. Nomtshongwana, T. A., & Manyakaza, A. (2025). Learning barriers for children with disabilities in inclusive primary schools in Chris Hani East District, South Africa. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2025.2596977
  36. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  37. Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftw
  38. Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. In A. Kaufman (Ed.), Capabilities equality: Basic issues and problems (pp. 44–70). Routledge.
  39. Nzuza, Z. D., & Sulaimon, J. T. (2025). Conceptualising Inclusive Education: Insights from South African Primary School Principals. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 7(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i1.23615
  40. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
  41. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  42. Ramango, T. (2021). Resource constraints in inclusive education: A South African perspective. African Journal of Disability, 10(1), 1–9.
  43. Ramango, T., & Naicker, S. (2022). Leadership challenges in inclusive education. South African Journal of Education, 42(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i86a05
  44. Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2021). Qualitative Research: Bridging the Conceptual, Theoretical, and Methodological. Sage.
  45. Sarkar, R., & Kalita, L. (2026). Positivist, interpretive, and constructivist approaches: Research paradigms. In A. A. Editor & B. B. Editor (Eds.), Innovative approaches to social research challenges (pp. 71–138). IGI Global Scientific Publishing
  46. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-6410-0.ch004
  47. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  48. Sepadi, M. (2025). Inclusive education in resource-constrained settings: Exploring mainstream teachers’ curriculum knowledge and practices for autistic learners in South Africa. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1641336. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1641336
  49. Shi, J., & Sercombe, P. (2020). Poverty and inequality in rural education: evidence from China. Education as Change, 24(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.25159/1947-9417/4965
  50. Sibuyi, N. A., Segooa, M. Y., Molise, H. V., Modiba, N. S., & Mafumo, T. (2024). Investigation into the challenges experienced by school management teams (SMTs) post-pandemic in rural high schools in the Mopani-West Education District. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 9(2), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2024.28
  51. Simmie, G. M. (2023). Teacher professional learning: a holistic and cultural endeavour imbued with transformative possibility. Educational Review, 75(5), 916–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1978398
  52. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  53. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a Theory of Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000106726
  54. United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). (2017). Inclusive education: Ensuring access for all children. UNICEF.
  55. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (2023). Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education. UNESCO.
  56. University of South Africa. (2024). Policy on research ethics. University of South Africa. https://www.unisa.ac.za/static/corporate_web/Content/Research%20%26%20innovation/Research%20ethics/Documents/20222922%20Policy%20on%20Research%20Ethics%20to%20be%20Published%201%20October%202024%20.pdf
  57. Walton, E., & Engelbrecht, P. (2024). Inclusive education in South Africa: path dependencies and emergences. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(10), 2138–2156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2061608