SPECIAL ISSUE 1 July 2026
DOI DOI: 10.66434/ijsie.v1i1si.533

Teacher-student relationships and learner discipline in digital inclusive education: A relational pedagogy perspective from South Africa

Khanyisile Mbatha1
  1. 1 University of South Africa, South Africa

Abstract

The paradigm shifts from traditional to digital learning has instigated novel challenges for learner discipline, particularly in inclusive classrooms characterised by high levels of student diversity. While the current discourse largely focuses on technological solutions or behavioural management, it has overlooked the role of teacher-student relationships in shaping teacher-student engagement and learner behaviour online. This study argues that relational pedagogy intentionally cultivates caring teacher-student relationships, thus fostering positive student discipline in digitally mediated inclusive educational environments. Drawing on the Attachment Theory (Riley, 2010), the Community of Inquiry Theory (Garrison et al., 2000), and Noddings' (2013) Ethic of Care Theory, the study adopts a qualitative multiple-case study design to determine the perspectives of ten participants (four lecturers and six students) specifically from higher education digital inclusive classrooms in South Africa, demonstrating that the dynamics of learner discipline differ across educational sectors. The study revealed four findings: relational presence enhances engagement and self-regulation, relational deficits correspond with disengagement and behavioural challenges, contextual and structural factors mediate relational dynamics, and lecturers recognise relational approaches, but face systemic barriers, including large class sizes, limited time, and inadequate training. This study concludes that learner discipline in digitally inclusive educational settings must be reimagined not as a matter of control but as one that emerges from relational trust and belonging. These insights have practical implications for teacher professional development and an inclusive digital policy, representing South Africa’s contextually grounded perspective on global debates on learner discipline.

How to Cite

Mbatha, K. (2026). Teacher-student relationships and learner discipline in digital inclusive education: A relational pedagogy perspective from South Africa. International Journal of Studies in Inclusive Education, 1(1si), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.66434/ijsie.v1i1si.533
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Adade, J. R. D., Amos, P. M., Antwi, T., Amoako, B. M., & Danquah, S. O. (2025). Teacher-student interpersonal relationship in digital education: Issues and implications for pedagogy. In Interpersonal relationships in the contemporary 21st-century society. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1008815
  2. Al Mawadieh, R. S. M., Razzak, L. F. A., & Al-Badawi, M. (2026). From face-to-face to screen: The changing dynamics of teacher-student relationships in the digital era. In R. S. M. Al-Mawadieh & H. Alsabatin (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence-Powered Education and Learning in Society 5.0. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95310-1_188
  3. Arianto, T. D., & Mulyono, R. (2023). Positive discipline to build student character in learning during the pandemic. Gema Wiralodra, 14(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.31943/gemawiralodra.v14i2.425
  4. Asrifan, A., Wajdi, F., Ishak, S., & Alwi, A. (2025). Humanizing the digital classroom: The educator's role in fostering connection amidst technology. In M. Alaqad, G. Al Murshidi, A. Bougdira, B. Almurshidi, & A. Al Zaabi (Eds), Blending human intelligence with technology (pp. 87–118). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0000-0.ch015
  5. Bayne, S. (2020). The teacher's voice: Postdigital pedagogies and the politics of surveillance. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00099-2
  6. Bonehill, A., & Iordan, M. (2024). Relational pedagogy and inclusion in higher education. In Conferinţa Ştiinţifică Internaţională a Universităţii Libere Internaţionale din Moldova (pp. 39–48). Free International University of Moldova. https://doi.org/10.54481/uekbs2024.v1.50
  7. Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Velasquez, A. (2020). The importance of interaction in online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  9. Calderwood, S. J. (2025). Surveillance digitisation, performativity, and teacher-student relationships in a blended learning setting. Postdigital Science and Education, 7(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00537-6
  10. Campbell, L., & Coker, H. (2025). Community, culture and care: Mapping relational pedagogy in online higher education. Discover Education, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00570-y
  11. Carrim, N., & Bekker, T. (2022). Placing inclusive education in conversation with digital education. South African Computer Journal, 34(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v34i2.1084
  12. Chen, M. K., & Shih, Y. H. (2025). The implications of Nel Noddings' ethics of care for fostering teacher-student relationships in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1602786. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1602786
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  14. Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D., Chambers, T., Chili, M.,..., & Wissing, G. (2020). A wake-up call: Equity, inequality, and Covid-19 emergency remote teaching and learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4
  15. Downie, S., Gao, X., Bedford, S., & Bell, K. (2021). Technology-enhanced learning environments in higher education: A cross-disciplinary study on teacher and student perceptions. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.4.12
  16. Escalante Torres, M. (2024). Teachers' experience serving students with emotional and behavioral disorders in distance learning (Unpublished PhD thesis), Minneapolis: Walden University, United States.
  17. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  18. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  19. Lapidot-Lefler, N. (2025). Teacher responsiveness in inclusive education: A participatory study of pedagogical practice, well-being, and sustainability. Sustainability, 17(7), 2919. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072919
  20. Letseka, M. (2012). In defence of Ubuntu. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-011-9267-2
  21. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  22. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  23. Metz, T. (2011). Ubuntu as a moral theory and human rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 11(2), 532–559.
  24. Mgqwashu, E., Timmis, S., de Wet, T., & Czerniewicz, L. (2020). Equity and inclusion in higher education: Lessons from South Africa. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429356490-1
  25. Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6), e16348 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348
  26. Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
  27. Obasi, H. U., & Madumere, R. (2024). Digital communication and student learning: Exploring the impact of digital tools on educational experiences and teacher-student relationships. All Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 1-15.
  28. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  29. Peruzzo, F., & Allan, J. (2024). Rethinking inclusive (digital) education: Lessons from the pandemic to reconceptualise inclusion through convivial technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 49(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2131817
  30. Pundir, R. (2026). Teacher-student relationships in inclusive classrooms: A review of theory, evidence, and practice. In R. K. Kushwaha, A. Verma, N. Y. Pradeep & K. Yadav (Eds), Accessibility pathways: Inclusive education for all (pp. 184–198). Springer.
  31. Riley, P. (2010). Attachment theory and the teacher-student relationship: A practical guide for teachers, teacher educators, and school leaders. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203845783
  32. Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students' engagement and achievement. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
  33. Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher-student relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672262
  34. Selwyn, N., Nemorin, S., Bulfin, S., & Johnson, N. (2021). Everyday schooling in the digital age: High school, high-tech? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429319028
  35. Thompson, C. S. (2018). The construct of 'respect' in teacher-student relationships: Exploring dimensions of ethics of care and sustainable development. Journal of Leadership Education, 17(3), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.12806/V17/I3/R3
  36. Waghid, Y. (2014). African philosophy of education reconsidered: On being human. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203538166
  37. Wentzel, K. R. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and adolescent competence. Child Development Perspectives, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00198.x
  38. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  39. Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z. (2024). AI in teacher education: Unlocking new dimensions in teaching support, inclusive learning, and digital literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12988