SPECIAL ISSUE 1 July 2026
DOI DOI: 10.66434/ijsie.v1i1si.532

Teacher leadership for effective learner discipline in digital learning and inclusive education: From policy to classroom practice

Abstract

Although national education policies promote equity, inclusion, learner discipline, and digital integration, limited attention has been given to how teacher preparation equips Foundation Phase teachers to exercise leadership in managing learner discipline in digitally mediated and inclusive classrooms. The study explored how teacher leadership supports effective learner discipline in digital learning and inclusive education contexts by examining teachers’ preparedness and the translation of policy expectations into classroom practice. The study was grounded in an interpretivist paradigm and adopted a qualitative research approach. A multiple-case study design was employed to gain an in-depth understanding of teachers' lived experiences across different school contexts. Six Foundation Phase teachers from three primary schools were purposively selected as participants. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews, which enabled participants to share their views on their preparedness, experiences, and challenges in managing learner discipline in digital and inclusive learning environments. The data were analysed thematically to identify recurring patterns, meanings, and themes in the participants’ responses. The study was informed by transformative leadership theory and inclusive education frameworks, foregrounding principles of equity, social justice, learner diversity, and responsiveness in technology-enhanced learning contexts. The preliminary findings reveal that while teachers recognise the importance of positive learner discipline in online, blended, and technology-supported classrooms, many feel underprepared to assume leadership roles in digital classroom management. The main challenges include limited formal training in digital discipline strategies, inadequate professional development opportunities, insufficient school-based digital conduct policies, and a lack of clear institutional guidance for managing learner behaviour in inclusive digital environments. The findings further suggest that teacher leadership in digital discipline is weakened when teachers are expected to implement policy without adequate preparation, resources, and professional support. The study concludes that strengthening teacher leadership for effective learner discipline in digital and inclusive classrooms requires deliberate investment in both pre-service and in-service teacher education. It recommends integrating digital discipline competencies, inclusive pedagogical strategies, digital citizenship, and early years leadership development into teacher education programmes. The study also highlights the need for professional learning communities, clear school-based digital discipline policies, and targeted capacity-building initiatives. Closing the gap between policy and classroom practice can enhance teachers’ leadership capacity, promote equitable learner participation, and improve learning outcomes in digitally evolving inclusive educational contexts.

How to Cite

Mulovhedzi, S. (2026). Teacher leadership for effective learner discipline in digital learning and inclusive education: From policy to classroom practice. International Journal of Studies in Inclusive Education, 1(1si), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.66434/ijsie.v1i1si.532

References

  1. Agus, M. (2026). Critical digital literacy for teachers: Evaluating pedagogical models, support systems, and policy implications in a hybrid learning era. Teaching and Teacher Education, 175, 105437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2026.105437
  2. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
  3. Antoninis, M., Alcott, B., Al Hadheri, S., April, D., Fouad Barakat, B., Barrios Rivera, M., & Weill, E. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO: Paris, France.
  4. Antonopoulou, H., Matzavinou, P., Giannoukou, I., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Teachers’ digital leadership and competencies in primary education: A cross-sectional behavioral study. Education Sciences, 15(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020215
  5. Bo, N. S. W. (2025). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective education ecosystem. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2024.00340
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-00
  7. Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurol. Res. Pract. 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
  8. Desniyanti, D. (2025). The role of teachers in the development of digital literacy. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(2), 538-552. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.535
  9. Dexter, S., & Richardson, J. W. (2020). What does technology integration research tell us about the leadership of technology?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1668316
  10. Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449-2472 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
  11. Feng, Y., Zhou, D., & Wei, Y. (2025). The Impact of School Leadership on Inclusive Education Literacy: Examining the Sequential Mediation of Job Stress and Teacher Agency. Behavioral Sciences, 15(11), 1572. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
  12. Florian, L., & Spratt, J. (2013). Enacting inclusion: A framework for interrogating inclusive practice. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 28(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2013.778111
  13. Florian, L., Black-Hawkins, K., & Rouse, M. (2016). Achievement and inclusion in schools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750279
  14. Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. (2024). Cultivating teacher leadership: evidence from a transformative professional development model. School Leadership & Management, 44(4), 413–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2024.2328056
  15. Gülsün, I., Malinen, O. P., Yada, A., & Savolainen, H. (2023). Exploring the role of teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education, their self-efficacy, and collective efficacy in behaviour management in teacher behaviour. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104228
  16. Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2018). Why context matters: A comparative perspective on education reform and policy implementation. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 17(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-018-9231-9
  17. Herring, M. C., Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (Vol. 3, pp. 189–200). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771328
  18. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
  19. Kim, J., Florian, L., & Pantić, N. (2022). The development of inclusive practice under a policy of integration. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(10), 1068–1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1773946
  20. Makoelle, T.M. (2016). Inclusive teaching in South Africa (First edition). Published: SUN Media Metro. https://doi.org/10.18820/9781928355038
  21. Mirza, H., Mirza, C., & Bellalem, F. (2023). Ethical considerations in qualitative research: Summary guidelines for novice social science researchers. Social Studies and Research Journal, 11(1), 441–449. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/220704
  22. Nguyen, T., Netto, C. L., Wilkins, J. F., Bröker, P., Vargas, E. E., Sealfon, C. D., ... & Stein, G. M. (2021, April). Insights into students’ experiences and perceptions of remote learning methods: From the COVID-19 pandemic to best practice for the future. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 6, p. 647986). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.647986
  23. Sabri, S. M., Ismail, I., Khushairi, N. A. M., Shafee, M. I. K., & Abdul Rahman, N. R. (2026). Major trends in technology integration for classroom instruction research: A bibliometric analysis from 2016 to 2025. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(3), 7198–7224. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300527
  24. Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350145573
  25. Sharma, U., & Sokal, L (2015). The Impact of a Teacher Education Course on Pre-Service Teachers’ Beliefs About Inclusion: An International Comparison. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 15(4), 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12043.
  26. Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  27. Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1
  28. Ventista, O. M., & Brown, C. (2023). Teachers’ professional learning and its impact on students’ learning outcomes: Findings from a systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100565
  29. Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478
  30. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  31. York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255