ARTICLE TEXT
DOI DOI: 10.66434/ijsie.v3i2.447

School governing body engagement as a catalyst for strengthening learner discipline in contexts of multiple deprivations

Hlengiwe Goodness Khanyile1
  1. 1 Universisty of Zululand, South Africa

Abstract

Learner discipline remains a persistent challenge in South African schools, particularly in communities affected by multiple deprivations such as poverty, unemployment, family instability, substance abuse, and limited access to social support services. This study examined how School Governing Bodies (SGBs) strengthen learner discipline in secondary schools situated within such contexts. Guided by Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Social Capital Theory, the study explored how cultural norms, stakeholder relationships, and community engagement shape disciplinary practices and outcomes. A qualitative case study design was employed in two secondary schools in the King Cetshwayo District of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Data were generated through semi-structured interviews with ten purposively selected participants, comprising school principals, School Management Team members, SGB chairpersons, parent representatives serving on SGBs, and members of the Representative Council of Learners. The findings revealed four interconnected pathways through which SGBs influence learner discipline: mediating home–school relationships, enforcing disciplinary norms, mobilising community support, and buffering the effects of socio-economic deprivation. However, the effectiveness of these interventions was constrained by parental disengagement, inconsistent disciplinary practices, substance abuse, and broader socio-economic challenges. The study further demonstrates that learner discipline in deprived contexts is best understood through the interaction of culturally grounded authority structures and relational networks. Based on these findings, an Integrated Cultural–Relational Governance Framework is proposed to explain how SGBs mobilise communal responsibility, trust, and collaborative partnerships to strengthen learner discipline. The study highlights the need for context-responsive governance policies, strengthened home–school partnerships, and enhanced capacity building for SGBs and educators to support positive learner behaviour in contexts of multiple deprivation.

How to Cite

Khanyile, H. G. (2026). School governing body engagement as a catalyst for strengthening learner discipline in contexts of multiple deprivations. International Journal of Studies in Inclusive Education, 3(2), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.66434/ijsie.v3i2.447
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Adebayo, A. S., & Moodley, T. (2021). Social capital and school improvement: Rethinking community–school relationships. South African Journal of Education, 41(3), 1–10.
  2. Battiste, M. (2005). Indigenous knowledge: Foundations for First Nations. WINHEC: International Journal of Indigenous Education Scholarship, 1(1), 1–17.
  3. Beckmann, J., & Prinsloo, I. J. (2009). Safety and security in schools. Van Schaik.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  8. Davids, G. E. (2024). Collective ownership for learner discipline in South African schools. Issues in Educational Research, 34(4), 1223–1240.
  9. Dei, G. J. S. (2000). Rethinking the role of Indigenous knowledges in the academy. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 4(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/136031100284849
  10. Du Plessis, P., & Mestry, R. (2024). Violence in rural schools in South Africa: Perceptions of school principals and school governing bodies. Perspectives in Education, 42(1), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v42i1.7173.
  11. Emekako, R. (2026). Learner misconduct in South African schools: A psychosocial approach to causes and interventions. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 7, 13. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2026712.
  12. Gower, G., Ferguson, C., & Forrest, S. (2020). Building effective school–community partnerships in Aboriginal remote school settings. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 50(2), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2020.11
  13. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  14. Henning, E., Van Rensburg, W., & Smit, B. (2004). Finding your way in qualitative research. Van Schaik.
  15. Kekana, L., & Makura, A. (2020). The importance of school governing bodies in the effective governance of public schools: Do women have a role? ADVED 2020: 6th International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences Proceedings https://doi.org/10.47696/adved.2020x255.
  16. Khan, N. (2024). Research ethics in education and training. In R. K. Kushwaha & J. Sonker (eds.), Ethical frameworks in special education: A guide for researchers (pp. 79–95). Bluerose. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161241240030
  17. Khanyile, H. G., & Mpuangnan, K. N. (2024). Complex dynamics of the School Governing Body in using an integrated management approach to maintain discipline among high school learners. Research in Educational Policy and Management, 6(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.46303/repam.2024.38
  18. Kruger, J., Beckmann, J., & Du Plessis, A. (2022). The management and governance conundrum in South African public schools: Principals’ perspectives. Perspectives in Education, 40(4), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.38140/pie.v40i4.5735.
  19. Liguluka, A., & Onyango, D. (2020). Effectiveness of secondary school boards in managing students’ discipline among public secondary schools in Ulanga District, Morogoro, Tanzania. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 1(3), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2020v01i03.0058
  20. Mapara, J. (2022). Rethinking Indigenous Knowledge Systems in African education. Journal of Black Studies, 53(7), 665–684.
  21. Mawere, M., & Awuah-Nyamekye, S. (2020). Indigenous knowledge and the African school. African Humanities Press.
  22. McCluskey, G., & Lephalala, M. (2010). A person is a person because of others: Challenges to meanings of discipline in South African and UK schools. Power and Education, 2(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.2304/power.2010.2.1.18
  23. Moyo, H., Litshani, N. F., Mashau, T. S., Sebopetsa, N. S., & Mohale, A. B. (2023). Learner participation in the School Governing Bodies: Governance of public schools in South Africa. Gender and Behaviour, 21(1), 20973–20983. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-genbeh_v21_n1_a10
  24. Nieuwenhuis, J., Beckmann, J., & Prinsloo, J. (2007). Growing human rights and values in education. Van Schaik.
  25. Noble, M., McLennan, D., Noble, S., Plunkett, E., Gutacker, N., & Wright, G. (2019). The English indices of deprivation 2019: Research report. Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
  26. Ntshangase, S. D. (2025). Reconceptualising student discipline in South African schools: Implications for teachers. African Journal of Teacher Education and Development, 4(1), Article 106. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajoted.v4i1.106
  27. Omwenga, M., Anika, A., & Mwangi, W. (2024). Impact of parental deprivation on academic success of children: A study of public primary schools in Masaba South, Kenya. Advances in Research, 25(6), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.9734/air/2024/v25i61184.
  28. Padayachee, A. S., & Gcelu, N. (2022). Collaboration: The key to managing discipline in South African schools. South African Journal of Education, 42(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42n4a2139
  29. Pascale, J., Lineback, J. F., Bates, N., & Beatty, P. (2022). Protecting the identity of participants in qualitative research. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 10(3), 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smab048
  30. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
  31. Shizha, E., & Kariwo, M. (2021). Culture, IKS, and education in Africa: Implications for policy and practice. International Journal of Educational Development, 81, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102373
  32. Stahl, G., Schulz, S., Baak, M., & Adams, B. (2024). “You fight your battles, and you work out how you’re going to change”: the implementation, embedding, and limits of restorative practices in an Australian rural community school. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2023.2228215
  33. Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538
  34. Townsend, P. (1987). Deprivation. Journal of Social Policy, 16(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400020341
  35. Washington, S., & Johnson, L. (2023). Toward culturally sustaining/revitalizing Indigenous family-school-community leadership. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1192095. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1192095
  36. Wolhuter, C. C., & Van der Walt, J. L. (2020). Indiscipline in South African schools: The parental/community perspective. Koers, 85(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.19108/koers.85.1.2436