ARTICLE TEXT
DOI DOI: 10.66434/ijsie.v3i2.440

Reimagining accounting education in rural South African schools: Collaborative pedagogy for inclusive learning and analytical skill development

Walusa Ajuma1
  1. 1 University of the Free State, South AFrica

Abstract

The persistent use of teacher-centered methods in under-resourced rural South African schools creates a significant barrier to equitable participation and the development of higher-order analytical skills in accounting education, particularly for learners from diverse linguistic and socioeconomic backgrounds. This qualitative study, grounded in an interpretive paradigm, explored how collaborative learning strategies can foster inclusive learning environments and enhance the development of analytical skills among Grade 10 learners in three rural secondary schools in the uMgungundlovu district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Using participatory research design, the study involved 30 learners and three teachers in collaborative pedagogical interventions. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions, and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings revealed that structured collaboration not only improved learners’ analytical reasoning and problem-solving skills but also created a more inclusive classroom by redistributing participation, enabling peer scaffolding, and reducing language barriers. These findings suggest that integrating inclusive, collaborative pedagogies into accounting education can foster more equitable and engaging learning environments in post-colonial educational settings.

How to Cite

Ajuma, W. (2026). Reimagining accounting education in rural South African schools: Collaborative pedagogy for inclusive learning and analytical skill development. International Journal of Studies in Inclusive Education, 3(2), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.66434/ijsie.v3i2.440
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Adebola, O. O., & Tsotetsi, C. (2022). Collaborative learning: A veritable tool for promoting classroom participation among pre-service teachers in rural universities in South Africa. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 5(2), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2022.20
  2. Aguis, J. (2024). Inclusive education for all: a qualitative exploration of fostering social justice and supporting students with special educational needs in the learning environment. MCAST Journal of Applied Research & Practice, 7(3), 20-39.
  3. Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of medicine, surgery, and public health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
  4. Akmad, A. (2025). Between Need and Hesitation: Analysis on the Social Factors Affecting Student Help-Seeking Behavior. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(10), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.604
  5. Alam, M. S., Asmawi, A., & Fatema, S. (2025). Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) for qualitative and mixed-method approaches: Principles, applications, and key considerations. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 5(4), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.4.8
  6. Alexaki, N., Foulidi, X., & Papakitsos, E. C. (2022). The Three Dimensions of Inclusive Education in the Attempt for Educational Change: Cultures, Policies and Practices. Journal of Research Initiatives, 6(1), 5.
  7. Boud, D., & Bearman, M. (2024). The assessment challenge of social and collaborative learning in higher education. Educational philosophy and theory, 56(5), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2114346
  8. Brand, C., Hartmann, C., Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2023). Do students learn more from failing alone or in groups? Insights into the effects of collaborative versus individual problem solving in productive failure. Instructional Science, 51(6), 953-976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09619-7
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology, 9(1), 3.
  10. Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & quantity, 56(3), 1391-1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
  11. Capstick, T., & Ateek, M. (2024). Translanguaging spaces as safe space for psycho-social support in refugee settings in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(2), 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1899192
  12. Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., de-Graft Aikins, A., & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(1), 34.
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
  14. Danial, L., Koenen, J., & Tiemann, R. (2026). Critical thinking performance assessment in an undergraduate physical chemistry laboratory course: Developing a contextual critical thinking coding manual. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 10(1), 37-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/17367
  15. Dlamini, R. S. (2022). Complex Inequalities and Inequities in Education: Expanding Socially Just Teaching and Learning through Digitalisation in South Africa. Alternation.
  16. Fletcher, J. F., Everatt, J., Chang, G., & Subramaniam, Y. (2025). Teacher collaboration and innovative learning spaces in New Zealand. Teachers and Teaching, 31(2), 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2401062
  17. Fong, M., Chen, H., Butler, L., & Herman, G. (2022, August). Developing an Observation Protocol for Cooperative Learning. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
  18. Goh, Q. S., Majeed, T. A., Yau, W. P., & Ho, H. K. (2025). Students’ and instructors’ perception on graded class participation: a multidisciplinary perspective within a comprehensive research university. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2492691. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2492691
  19. Gonda, D., Tirpáková, A., Pavlovičová, G., & Ďuriš, V. (2024). The role of a team psychological safety feeling in teamwork in the classroom. Heliyon, 10(18). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37618
  20. Guo, R., Jantharajit, N., & Thongpanit, P. (2024). Construct an Instructional Approach Based on Collaborative Learning and Reflective Learning for Enhance Students' Analytical Thinking and Critical Thinking Skills. Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, 8(2), 115-125. DOI: 10.55493/5052.v8i2.5184
  21. Hull, D. M., Fagan, M. A., González-Carriedo, R., Boyd, R., Lemmons, F., Parker, P., & Sebastian, P. (2025). Literacy Skill Development in Bilingual Learners: A Quasi-Experiment of Small Group Instruction. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2025.2569587
  22. Lane, D. R. (2023). Peer feedback processes and individual accountability in team-based learning. Team-based learning in the social sciences and humanities, 51-62.
  23. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
  24. Levy-Feldman, I. (2025). The role of assessment in improving education and promoting educational equity. Education Sciences, 15(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020224
  25. Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian marketing journal, 33(2), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
  26. Lin, S. H. C., & Leung, A. H. C. (2024). ESL classroom interactions in a translanguaging space. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(6), 2397-2425.
  27. Mendo-Lázaro, S., León-del-Barco, B., Polo-del-Río, M. I., & López-Ramos, V. M. (2022). The impact of cooperative learning on university students’ academic goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 787210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787210
  28. Mkhize, T. R., & Davids, M. N. (2023). Resources mobilisation challenges in rural schools of South Africa: What can we learn?. REMIE: Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 13(3), 295-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/remie.9311
  29. Monteiro, A. K., Cheyne, M., & Kline, L. (2024). Fostering inclusive collaboration: Strategies to disrupt inequities in student groupwork. The Science Teacher, 91(3), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368555.2024.2337877
  30. Namaziandost, E., Behbahani, H. K., & Naserpour, A. (2024). Peer support in language learning: Mitigating anxiety, enhancing achievement, cultivating growth mindsets, and increasing enjoyment. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 7(2), 296-313. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.40
  31. Ngqunguza, A., & Seleke, Z. (2024). Multilingualism in the Teaching and Learning of Accounting in Chris Hani West District, South Africa. Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(7), 2817-30. https://doi.org/10.38159/jelt.20245103
  32. Ngwenya, J., & Hlophe, N. Q. (2022). Teaching strategies used to develop higher-order thinking skills in financial accounting in selected schools in South Africa. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 173-183. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2022.100206
  33. Nieminen, J. H., & Lahdenperä, J. (2024). Assessment and epistemic (in) justice: how assessment produces knowledge and knowers. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(1), 300-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1973413
  34. Nkosi, L. W., Mushayikwa, E., & Radebe, N. (2025). EXPLORING THE ROLE OF HOME LANGUAGE IN ENHANCING CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES IN A MULTILINGUAL CLASSROOM. In ICERI2025 Proceedings (pp. 4226-4235). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2025.1239
  35. Nsor-Ambala, R. (2022). The impact of collaborative learning approaches on assessment outcomes in an accounting theory class. Accounting Education, 31(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1944232
  36. Nsor-Ambala, R. (2022). The impact of collaborative learning approaches on assessment outcomes in an accounting theory class. Accounting Education, 31(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1944232
  37. Nzuza, Z. D. (2023). Strategies for creating inclusive learning for learners experiencing barriers to learning. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 9(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v9i2.64913
  38. Ofstad, B., Bartel-Radic, A., & Cucchi, A. (2026). Trainers training trainers: the factors of cooperative learning in times of digital transformation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-08-2025-0280
  39. ONI, J. O., ADEYEMI, M. B., & JIMOH, A. G. (2024). EFFECT OF JIGSAW INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY ON FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STUDENTS'ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN COLLEGES OF EDUCATION IN SOUTH-WEST, NIGERIA. Journal of Science Vocational and Technical Education (JOSVTE). Vol, 11(1).
  40. Ravi, M. (2025). Digital Simulation‐Based Learning for Reaction Engineering: Activity Design and Student Metacognition. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 33(3), e70038. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.70038
  41. Rhinesmith, E., Anglum, J. C., Park, A., & Burrola, A. (2023). Recruiting and retaining teachers in rural schools: A systematic review of the literature. Peabody Journal of Education, 98(4), 347-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2023.2238491
  42. Sebele-Mpofu, F. Y. (2024). Hidden curriculum in accounting education in the digital era: the evolution, role, controversies, challenges and implications. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 2402123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2402123
  43. Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing inclusive learning environments: Strategies for curriculum adaptation and modification. Future of special education in India, 109, 121.
  44. Siller, H. S., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Analyzing the impact of collaborative learning approach on grade six students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14153
  45. Siregar, T. (2025). Application of the Peer Tutoring Method in Enhancing Students’ Mathematical Understanding and Learning Motivation. doi: 10.20944/preprints202510.1627.v1
  46. Stockless, A., & Brière, S. (2024). How to encourage inclusion in a qualitative research project using a design-based research methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241227852. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241227852
  47. Sultana, T. (2025). The impacts of students’ socio-economic background on English language learning: a study of challenges in rural Bangladesh (Doctoral dissertation, BRAC University).
  48. Thorne, S. (2025). Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003503538
  49. Tobia, V., Sacchi, S., Cerina, V., Manca, S., & Fornara, F. (2022). The influence of classroom seating arrangement on children’s cognitive processes in primary school: the role of individual variables. Current Psychology, 41(9), 6522-6533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01154-9
  50. Torabian, J. E. (2025). Empowering voices: Participatory research for educational equality. In Equity in education: A handbook for participative approaches in research and development to address school inequalities (pp. 10-61). CEEOLPRESS.
  51. Turhan, Z., & Bernard, C. (2022). Challenges and strategies of translation in a qualitative and sensitive research. Qualitative Research, 22(3), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794121999003
  52. Venkateswaran, N., Feldman, J., Hawkins, S., Lewis, M. A., Armstrong-Brown, J., Comfort, M., ... & Pineda, D. (2023). Bringing an equity-centered framework to research: Transforming the researcher, research content, and practice of research.
  53. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  54. Walton, E., & Engelbrecht, P. (2024). Inclusive education in South Africa: Path dependencies and emergences. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(10), 2138-2156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2061608
  55. Woelert, P., Vidovich, L., & O’Donoghue, T. (2024). Breaking the mould: A comparative study of ‘radical’university curriculum reforms in a context of global-local policy flows. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 54(2), 203-221.
  56. Woelert, P., Vidovich, L., & O’Donoghue, T. (2024). Breaking the mould: A comparative study of ‘radical’university curriculum reforms in a context of global-local policy flows. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 54(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2022.2092720
  57. Yang, X. (2023). A historical review of collaborative learning and cooperative learning. TechTrends, 67(4), 718-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00823-9
  58. Yanti, Y., & Kelvin, K. (2025). Briefing on the Accounting Cycle as a Basis for Preparing Financial Statements for Providentia High School Students. JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY SERVICE, 5(2), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.55047/jscs.v5i2.956
  59. Zhou, T., & Colomer, J. (2024). Cooperative learning promoting cultural diversity and individual accountability: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060567