ARTICLE TEXT
DOI DOI: 10.38140/ijsie.v1i1.1289

Teachers implementing Zimbabwean sign language regulatory frameworks for deaf learners in special schools

Reward Kwashira 1
  1. 1 Great Zimbabwe University, Zimbabwe

Abstract

Effective implementation of sign language-based instruction is crucial for providing quality education to Deaf learners at special schools. Teachers experienced challenges to effectively implement sign language policies for the Deaf learners in Zimbabwean special schools. However, this study explores how teachers implement sign language regulatory frameworks for Deaf Learners in special schools. Drawing on qualitative data from teachers, headmasters, school inspectors, and psychologists. The findings revealed critical gaps in the in-service training and professional development opportunities available to teachers serving Deaf students. Despite teachers reporting difficulties with sign language fluency and inadequate understanding of Deaf culture and pedagogy, the study found a disconnect between teachers' expressed needs and the perspectives of district-level officials, who often did not perceive additional training as necessary. This study further highlights the heavy reliance on support from external donor organizations and NGOs to provide teachers with limited sign language workshops and resources. This overreliance on precarious external funding sources compromises the sustainability and scalability of professional development initiatives. The study's implications call for a comprehensive, government-led strategy to ensure all teachers in Deaf schools receive robust, long-term training in sign language, Deaf education methodologies, and Deaf cultural competence. Strengthening the capacity of the teaching workforce is essential for upholding the rights of Deaf learners to receive instruction in their primary language and achieving meaningful implementation of sign language policies. This study contributes vital empirical evidence to inform policy reforms and teacher training programmes to support using Zimbabwean Sign Language as a medium of instruction for the Deaf.

How to Cite

Kwashira , R. . (2024). Teachers implementing Zimbabwean sign language regulatory frameworks for deaf learners in special schools . International Journal of Studies in Inclusive Education, 1(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijsie.v1i1.1289
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

References

  1. Adebayo, A. S., & Ngwenya, K. (2015). Challenges in the implementation of inclusive education at Elulakeni cluster primary schools in Shiselweni district of Swaziland. European Scientific Journal, 11(13), 252-258.
  2. Akoth, J. (2021). Factors influencing the development of Ugandan sign language in the learning environment: A case study of Uganda school for the Deaf Kampala city (Unpublished PhD thesis), Kampala: Kyambogo University, Republic of Uganda.
  3. Alzahrani, A. (2022). Early Sign Language: Psychological and Mental Health of Deaf Babies. ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, 23(6), 79-93.
  4. Amankwaa, L. (2016). Creating protocols for trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 23(3), 121-127. Retrieved from http://www.tuckerpub.com/jcd.htm
  5. Amaoko, S. F. (2019). Sixty years of Deaf education in Ghana (1957-2017) Commun Disorder Deaf Study Hearing Aids, 7(1), 1-11.
  6. Anum, G. (2017). Research Instruments for Data Collection. Department of Fine Art and Media Art Technology. Ghana: Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology.
  7. Chifinda, R. (2017). Facilitators and barriers in academic assessment of learners with hearing impairment: A case of examinations council of Zambia (Unpublished PhD thesis), Lusaka: University of Zambia, Zambia.
  8. Chupina, K. (2006). The Role of Sign Language in Sweden. Florida.
  9. Constitution of Zimbabwe. (2013). Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment No. 20 Act. Harare: Fidelity Printers. https://www.refworld.org/legal/legislation/natlegbod/2013/en97607
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  11. Deng, Z. (2017). Rethinking curriculum and teaching. In G. W. Noblit (Ed.). Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (1-32) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  13. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
  14. Glaser, M., & Van Pletzen, E. (2012). Inclusive education for deaf students: Literacy practices and South African Sign language. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 30(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2012.693707
  15. Government of Zimbabwe (2002) Secretary’s Circular No. 3 of 2002. Curriculum policy: Primary and Secondary Schools. Harare: Ministry of Education, Sport and Culture, Government Printers.
  16. Khumalo, S. W. (2014). An implementation analysis of the language policy in basic education in selected schools in eThekwini Municipality (Unpublished PhD thesis). Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
  17. Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. 42(8), 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
  18. Kyngäs, H., Kääriäinen, M., & Elo, S. (2020). The Trustworthiness of Content Analysis. In H. Kyngäs, K. Mikkonen, M. Kääriäinen, (eds) The Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research (41-48). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_5
  19. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1989). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. The Review of Higher Education, 12(3), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1989.0017
  20. Luckner, J. L., & Ayantoye, C. (2013). Itinerant teachers of students who are deaf or hard of hearing: Practices and preparation. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 18(3), 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/ent015
  21. Matende, T., Sibanda, C., Chandavengerwa, N. M., & Sadiki, M. (2021). Critical language awareness in the education of students who are deaf in Zimbabwe. South African Journal of African Languages, 41(3), 240-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2021.2010918
  22. Morgan, D. L., Eliot, S., Lowe, R. A., & Gorman, P. (2016). Dyadic interviews as a tool for qualitative evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(1), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214015611244
  23. Mpuang, K. D., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Malatsi, N. (2015). Sign language as medium of instruction in Botswana primary schools: Voices from the field. Deafness & Education International, 17(3), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1179/1557069X14Y.0000000047
  24. Mugarura, P., Ssempala, F., & Nachuha, S. (2022). Role of in-service for the students’ performance in selected public secondary schools in Kisoro District. International Journal of Educational Policy Research and Review, 9, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.15739/IJEPRR.22.001
  25. Mulonda, M. (2013). A situational analysis in the use of Sign Language in the education of the Deaf in Zambia: A case of Magwero and St Joseph Schools for the Deaf (Unpublished Masters thesis). Lusaka: University of Zambia, Zambia.
  26. Munoz-Baell, I. M., & Ruiz, M. T. (2000). Empowering the deaf. Let the deaf be deaf. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 54(1), 40-44.
  27. Musengi, M. (2019). The place of Sign Language in the inclusive education of Deaf learners in Zimbabwe amid CRPD (mis)interpretation. African Disability Rights Yearbook, 7, 96-111. https://doi.org/10.29053/2413-7138/2019/v7a5
  28. Nelson, M. M. (2015). Deaf Education Services in Southern Regions of Vietnam: A survey of Teacher Perceptions and Recommendations. Deafness and Educational International, 3(3), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1179/1557069X14Y.0000000048
  29. Ngobeni, W. P., Maimane, J. R., & Rankhumise, M. P. (2020). The effect of limited sign language as barrier to teaching and learning among Deaf learners in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 40(2), Art. #1735, 7 pages, https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n2a1735
  30. Nkolola-Wakumelo, M., & Manyando, M. (2013). A situational analysis of the use of sign language in the education of the Deaf in Zambia: A case of Magwero and St Joseph's schools for the Deaf. Language Matters, 44(3), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2013.839733
  31. Pakata, B. F. (2015). Factors influencing use of sign language in teaching and learning in public primary schools in Kiambu County, Kenya. (Unpublished Masters thesis), Nairobi: University of Nairobi, Kenya.
  32. Parkin, I. (2010). Factors affecting deaf education in South Africa. American Annals of the Deaf, 155(4), 490-493. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26235088
  33. Pearse, N. (2019). An illustration of deductive analysis in qualitative research. In 18th European conference on research methodology for business and management studies (p. 264). https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.17.3.004
  34. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2014). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  35. Rankhumise, M. P. (2020). The effect of limited sign language as barrier to teaching and learning among Deaf learners in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 40(2), #1735, 7 pages, https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n2a1735
  36. Ruslin, R., Mashuri, S., Rasak, M. S. A., Alhabsyi, F., & Syam, H. (2022). Semi-structured Interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 12(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229
  37. Sambu, M. C., Otube, N., & Bunyasi, B. A. (2018). Assessment of academic performance of learners with hearing impairment in selected special primary schools in Kenya. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(2), 1-12. Retrieved from www.ijern.com
  38. Sibanda, P. (2015). Analysis of sign language proficiency among teachers of the deaf in primary schools in Bulawayo (Zimbabwe): Implications for learning and inclusion. Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 4(9), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.14196/sjpas.v4i9.1904
  39. Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  40. Stein, C. (2013). Hearing Impaired and ADHD: How They Affect Students’Ability to Learn Maths. Georgia: Georgia College and State University.
  41. Stemela-Zali, U., Kathard, H., & Sefotho, M. M. (2022). The matrix of linguistic exclusions impeding career construction for D/deaf learners. African Journal of Disability, 11, 935.
  42. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2000). The Dakar Framework for Action: Education for All: Meeting our Collect Commitments. Paris: UNESCO. Derived from the World Education Forum Proceeding Dakar, Senegal, April.
  43. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNESCO. (2004). Education for all: The quality imperative. EFA global monitoring report 2005. Paris: UNESCO.
  44. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (1994). World Conference on Special Needs Education, Salamanca, Spain.
  45. Wakumelo, N. M. (2009). Provision of Education for the Deaf in Zambia: The Situation and Challenges. In University of Zambia School of Education and the Directorate of Research and Graduate Studies Conference.
  46. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Designs and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
  47. Zimbabwe Education Amendment Act, 2019 (Act 15-2019). https://www.veritaszim.net/node/4005&ved=2ahUKEwjhg4yzre-